<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Videoblog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.uni-giessen.de/videoblog-gcsc/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.uni-giessen.de/videoblog-gcsc</link>
	<description>des International Graduate Centre for the Study of Culture (GCSC)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 10:12:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<!-- podcast_generator="podPress/8.8" -->
		<copyright>&#xA9;GCSC International Graduate Centre for the Study of Culture  </copyright>
		<managingEditor>thies.boettcher@gcsc.uni-giessen.de (GCSC International Graduate Centre for the Study of Culture )</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>thies.boettcher@gcsc.uni-giessen.de(GCSC International Graduate Centre for the Study of Culture )</webMaster>
		<category></category>
		<ttl>1440</ttl>
		<itunes:keywords>Culture, Kultur, Graduiertenzentrum, graduate centre, Giessen, Universitauml;t, Kulturwissenschaft, Kulturwissenschaften, Exzellenzinitiative</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Audio- und Videopodcast des International Graduate Centre for the Study of Culture (GCSC) der Justus Liebig Universitauml;t Gieszlig;en
http://www.uni-giessen.de/videoblog-gcsc</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>GCSC International Graduate Centre for the Study of Culture </itunes:author>
		<itunes:category text="Education">
  <itunes:category text="Higher Education"/>
</itunes:category>
<itunes:category text="Society &amp; Culture"/>
<itunes:category text="Society &amp; Culture">
  <itunes:category text="History"/>
</itunes:category>
		<itunes:owner>
			<itunes:name>GCSC International Graduate Centre for the Study of Culture </itunes:name>
			<itunes:email>thies.boettcher@gcsc.uni-giessen.de</itunes:email>
		</itunes:owner>
		<itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:image href="http://www.uni-giessen.de/videoblog-gcsc/wp-content/plugins/podpress/images/powered_by_podpress_large.jpg" />
		
		<item>
		<title>‚Kleine Literatur’: Medialität und Epistemologie epischer Kurzformate in der Moderne</title>
		<link>http://www.uni-giessen.de/videoblog-gcsc/?p=1575</link>
		<comments>http://www.uni-giessen.de/videoblog-gcsc/?p=1575#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 10:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GGK/GCSC Keynote Lecture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uni-giessen.de/videoblog-gcsc/?p=1575</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Die Keynote handelt von der Medialität und Epistemologie epischer  Kurzformen der Moderne und Nachmoderne. In historischer wie  systematischer Perspektive wird nach dem kulturkritischen, politischen  und poetologischen Potential kleiner literarischer Formate gefragt.  Ausgehend von Roland Barthes´ Diktum, dass die Moral ihn &#8220;sanft  schreiben&#8221; lasse, wird zunächst eine Theorie der kleinen Form [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Die Keynote handelt von der Medialität und Epistemologie epischer  Kurzformen der Moderne und Nachmoderne. In historischer wie  systematischer Perspektive wird nach dem kulturkritischen, politischen  und poetologischen Potential kleiner literarischer Formate gefragt.  Ausgehend von Roland Barthes´ Diktum, dass die Moral ihn &#8220;sanft  schreiben&#8221; lasse, wird zunächst eine Theorie der kleinen Form  entwickelt, die nach deren Ethik fragt. Am Beispiel von Kurzprosaformen  von Ernst Jünger, Robert Musil, Elias Canetti und Alexander Kluge sollen  schließlich literarische Repräsentationsmuster vorgestellt werden, in  denen die Darstellung erlittener Schrecken, aggressiver Handlungen zu  Strategien der Pointierung, Straffung, aber auch der Zeitdehnung ins  Verhältnis gesetzt werden. Die Keynote geht der Frage nach, ob sich in  kleinen Formen neue Schreibweisen abzeichnen, die feste Gattungsgrenzen  hinter sich lassen und ob sie, um noch einmal Roland Barthes sprechen zu  lassen, im Feld des Experimentellen, Möglichen, als  &#8220;Wahrheitsgeneratoren&#8221; fungieren.</p>
<p><strong>Claudia Öhlschläger</strong>, *1963 in Mannheim, verheiratet mit Dr. phil. Jörg Westermayer, zwei Söhne</p>
<p><img class="alignright" src="http://www.uni-giessen.de/videoblog-gcsc/wp-content/COe2.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="231" /></p>
<p>Studium der Germanistik, Geschichte, Italianistik und Kunstgeschichte in Heidelberg und München</p>
<p>1990/91 Erstes Staatsexamen für Lehramt an Gymnasien und Magister Artium</p>
<p>Promotionsstipendium der Studienstiftung des Deutschen Volkes</p>
<p>1994 Promotion: &#8220;Unsägliche Lust des Schauens&#8221;. Die Konstruktion der  Geschlechter im voyeuristischen Text. Freiburg i. Br. (Rombach) 1996.</p>
<p>Postdoktorandin des Münchner Graduiertenkollegs &#8220;Geschlechterdifferenz &amp; Literatur&#8221;</p>
<p>1996-2002 Wissenschaftliche Assistentin am Institut für Deutsche  Philologie der Ludwig- Maximilians-Universität München (Lehrstuhl Prof.  Dr. Gerhard Neumann)</p>
<p>Habilitationsstipendium der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft</p>
<p>2002/03 Habilitation: Abstraktionsdrang. Wilhelm Worringer und der Geist der Moderne. Paderborn (Fink) 2005.</p>
<p>2003-2004 Akademische Rätin am Institut für Deutsche Philologie der Ludwig- Maximilians-Universität München</p>
<p>SoSe 2004 Vertretung einer Lehrstuhlprofessur am Germanistischen Seminar der Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf</p>
<p>Seit WS 2004/05 Professorin für Vergleichende Literaturwissenschaft und Intermedialität an der Universität Paderborn</p>
<p>März 2007: Gastprofessur an der École Normale Supérieure, rue d´Ulm, Paris.</p>
<p>März/April 2010: Max Kade Distinguished Visiting Professorship an der University of Washington, Seattle (USA)</p>
<p>Stipendium  der Heinrich-Hertz-Stiftung, Düsseldorf für einen Forschungsaufenthalt  an der University of Washington, Seattle (USA) im Frühjahr 2014 (Projekt  &#8220;Literarisches Tagebuch&#8221; mit Prof. Dr. Rick Gray)</p>
<br /><img src="http://www.uni-giessen.de/videoblog-gcsc/wp-content/Oehlschlaeger_thumb.jpg" alt="media" /><br />

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.uni-giessen.de/videoblog-gcsc/?feed=rss2&amp;p=1575</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spacing History &#8211; Zur Analyse räumlicher Dimensionen der Gesellschaft: Emergenz &#8211; Wahrnehmung &#8211; Praktiken &#8211; Imaginationen</title>
		<link>http://www.uni-giessen.de/videoblog-gcsc/?p=1523</link>
		<comments>http://www.uni-giessen.de/videoblog-gcsc/?p=1523#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 10:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GGK/GCSC Keynote Lecture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uni-giessen.de/videoblog-gcsc/?p=1523</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Angestoßen durch die Theoriedebatten in den Sozial- und Kulturwissenschaften ist der ›spatial turn‹ mittlerweile in vielen Disziplinen angekommen. Dem Selbstverständnis einiger seiner Vertreter/innen folgend, handelt es sich dabei um eine der derzeit innovativsten ›Wenden‹, jedoch zeigt sich bei genauerer Betrachtung eine Reihe von Problemen: Die Hinwendung zum Raum ist weder mit einem gemeinsamen Forschungsziel noch [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Angestoßen durch die Theoriedebatten in den Sozial- und Kulturwissenschaften ist der ›spatial turn‹ mittlerweile in vielen Disziplinen angekommen. Dem Selbstverständnis einiger seiner Vertreter/innen folgend, handelt es sich dabei um eine der derzeit innovativsten ›Wenden‹, jedoch zeigt sich bei genauerer Betrachtung eine Reihe von Problemen: Die Hinwendung zum Raum ist weder mit einem gemeinsamen Forschungsziel noch mit einer klar erkennbaren Methode verbunden. Außerdem besteht eine gewisse Diskrepanz zwischen einem theoretischen Forschungsdiskurs und den dazugehörigen Appellen, sich mehr mit ›Räumen‹ zu beschäftigen, und der immer noch geringen Anzahl methodisch-reflektierter Untersuchungen.</p>
<p>Der erste Teil des Vortrags, der diese Debatte skizziert, endet mit dem Plädoyer, Raum als analytische Kategorie statt als Gegenstand zu betrachten. In einem zweiten Teil des Vortrags wird dann ein Untersuchungsraster vorgestellt, welches sich prinzipiell für alle historisch arbeitenden Disziplinen eignet. In diesem Analyseraster sind u.a. die im Vortragstitel genannten Kategorien zentral. Erst damit wird eine differenziertere Sicht auf die raumzeitlichen Dimensionen spezifischer Gesellschaften, aber auch einzelner Akteure möglich. An einem Beispiel aus der Stadtgeschichte wird diese Methode schließlich umzusetzen versucht.<img class="alignright" src="http://www.uni-giessen.de/videoblog-gcsc/wp-content/GCSC_MC_RAU_gschrey01.jpg" alt="" width="143" height="212" /></p>
<p><strong>Susanne Rau</strong> ist Professorin für Geschichte und Kulturen der Räume in der Neuzeit an der Philosophischen Fakultät der Universität Erfurt.<br />
Nach dem Studium der Fächer allgemeine Rhetorik, Geschichtswissenschaft, Philosophie und Französisch an den Universitäten Tübingen, Hamburg und Reims wurde Susanne Rau 2001 an der Universität Hamburg promoviert. 2008 habilitierte sie sich an der Technischen Universität Dresden. 2009 erhielt Susanne Rau eine Heisenberg-Professur der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft und ist seitdem Professorin für Geschichte und Kulturen der Räume in der Neuzeit an der Universität Erfurt. Seit 2007 nimmt sie regelmäßig Lehraufträge an französischen Universitäten wahr. Seit 2010 ist sie Mitglied bei AcademiaNet (www.academia-net.de).</p>
<address style="text-align: right;"><span style="color: #888888;">Bild: Raul Gschrey</span></address>
<p>Forschung<br />
Zu den Forschungsschwerpunkten von Susanne Rau zählen die Bereiche: Stadtgeschichte und Urbanität, Geschichte der Historiographie, Erinnerungskultur, Reformation, Konfessionalisierung, religiöser Pluralismus in der Frühen Neuzeit, Soziabilität, Reiseberichte und Reiseerfahrung in der Vormoderne, Geschichte und Kulturen der Räume sowie „globaler&#8221; Handel in der Vormoderne.</p>
<address style="text-align: right;"> </address>
<p>Lehre<br />
In der Lehre bietet Susanne Rau Veranstaltungen zu den Themen: Utopien, Repräsentationen und Theorien über Stadt in der Neuzeit, Geschichte und Anthropologie des Raums, Reisen und Schreiben über Reisen in der Neuzeit, Paläographie der Neuzeit, Kulturgeografie für Historiker, Geschichte der Geschichtsschreibung, Weltkarten und Kosmographien sowie Orte des Konsums und der Soziabilität in frühneuzeitlichen Städten im BA und MA Geschichtswissenschaft an. Im Studium Fundamentale beteiligt sie sich an Veranstaltungen zu Themen wie öffentliche Räume in Geschichte und Gegenwart und an einem Wissenschaftspropädeutikum.</p>
<p>Ausgewählte Publikationen<br />
2010: <em>Fließende Räume oder: Wie läßsst sich die Geschichte des Flusses schreiben.</em> Historische Zeitschrift Vol. 291: S. 103 ff. (ed. mit Schwerhoff, G.)<br />
2008: <em>Topographien des Sakralen. Religion und Raumordnung in der Vormoderne</em>, Dölling &amp; Galitz Verlag.<br />
2007: <em>Public order in public space. Tavern conflict in early modern Lyon.</em> Urban History Vol. 34: S. 102 ff.<br />
2005: <em>Orte der Gastlichkeit – Orte der Kommunikation. Aspekte der Raumkonstitution von Herbergen in einer frühneuzeitlichen Stadt.</em> Zeitsprünge. Forschungen zur Frühen Neuzeit Vol. 9: S. 394 ff.<br />
2002: <em>Geschichte und Konfession. Städtische Geschichtsschreibung und Erinnerungskultur im Zeitalter von Reformation und Konfessionalisierung in Bremen, Breslau, Hamburg und Köln</em>, Dölling &amp; Galitz Verlag.</p>
<br /><img src="http://www.uni-giessen.de/videoblog-gcsc/wp-content/Rau_thumb.jpg" alt="media" /><br />
 
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.uni-giessen.de/videoblog-gcsc/?feed=rss2&amp;p=1523</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://flash.uni-giessen.de/vod/e1660a8a746611e2ab67940eb46694ce.flv" length="241940958" type="video/x-flv" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Humanities as Empirical Sciences</title>
		<link>http://www.uni-giessen.de/videoblog-gcsc/?p=1528</link>
		<comments>http://www.uni-giessen.de/videoblog-gcsc/?p=1528#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 13:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GGK/GCSC Keynote Lecture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uni-giessen.de/videoblog-gcsc/?p=1528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The very texts that became emblematic for the difference between the humanities and  the natural sciences make rather strong claims as to the fundamental similarities between these disciplinary fields. In particular, both the natural sciences and the  humanities are standardly viewed, in the period around 1900, as “empirical sciences” (to name an example: [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The very texts that became emblematic for the <em>difference</em> between the humanities and  the natural sciences make rather strong claims as to the <em>fundamental similarities</em> between these disciplinary fields. In particular, both the natural sciences and the  humanities are standardly viewed, in the period around 1900, as <em>“empirical sciences”</em> (to name an example: Wilhelm Windelband’s classical texts on the relationship  between the natural sciences and the humanities do not tire to emphasize this point).  The lecture will investigate the implications of this claim as to empiricity: which  notion of “experience” and of “empirical method” is at issue here? Which types of  experience are invoked (seeing that, at the same time, and closely related to the  project of conceptually structuring the field of the scientific disciplines, new  forms of experience were introduced in, f.i., phenomenology)? Which sort of  demarcatory criteria are used to separate the humanities from the natural sciences,  when both can be viewed as being ‘empirical’?</p>
<p><strong>Paul Ziche</strong> is professor for the history of modern philosophy at the University of Utrecht.<img class="alignright" src="http://www.uni-giessen.de/videoblog-gcsc/wp-content/ziche_portrait.jpg" alt="" width="183" height="237" /></p>
<p>1986-1992: studies in Munich and Oxford (1986-1988 physics, then M.A. in philosophy, with minors in physics and psychology)<br />
1988: Diploma-„Zwischenpruefung“ in physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich<br />
1989/1990: Graduate student in philosophy, University of Oxford<br />
1992: M.A. in philosophy (minors: Physics, psychology), Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich<br />
1995: Dr.phil., Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich; Title of Dr.phil.-Thesis: „Mathematische und naturwissenschaftliche Modelle in der Philosophie Schellings und Hegels“<br />
2003: Habilitation, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich; Title of the Habilitation-thesis: „Philosophie und Wissenschaften um 1900. Wissenschaftliche Philosophie als ‚nicht-reduktiver Szientismus’“<br />
since 2008: professor (chair) for the history of modern philosophy at the University of Utrecht<br />
2010: „Teacher of the year“ of Utrecht University</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Functions include</span><br />
Member of the Descartes Centrum for the history and philosophy of the sciences and the humanities<br />
(With Hans Bertens) Coordinator of the Honours-Minor-program of Utrecht University („Descartes College“)<br />
Member of the „bibliotheekscommissie“ of the faculty of humanities, University of Utrecht<br />
Member of the „opleidingscommissie“, department of philosophy, University of Utrecht</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Academic positions</span><br />
Member of the „Commission for the history of science“ at the Bavarian Academy of the Sciences and the Humanities, Munich<br />
Secretary of the „Internationale Schelling-Gesellschaft“<br />
Member of the TransCoop-project (funded by the Alexander-von-Humboldt-Gesellschaft): „Imaginary and Ideal Elements and Limit Concepts in Mathematics: Their Theory, History, and Philosophical Understanding“ (Directors: Michael Detlefsen, University of Notre Dame/Godehard Link, University, Munich)</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Former positions</span><br />
2001-2007: Academic employee at the „Kommission zur Herausgabe der Schriften von Schelling“, Bavarian Academy of the Sciences and the Humanities, Munich<br />
Lecturer (Privatdozent), Philosophy Department, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich1996-2000:  „Wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter“ (research assistant/assistant professor), Institute for the history of science, medicine and technology, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena<br />
Guest docent e.g. at the Institute Vienna Circle; Institut „HyperWerk“, Fachhochschule Nordwestschweiz, Basel; Venice International University</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Research interests include</span><br />
- History of philosophy, with a focus on the 18th and 19th century<br />
- German Idealism<br />
- Philosophy of nature<br />
- The historical development and systematic implications of the relationship between different forms of „Wissenschaft“/“wetenschappen“<br />
- History of universities and scientific organisations<br />
- History of psychology</p>
<br /><img src="http://www.uni-giessen.de/videoblog-gcsc/wp-content/Ziche_thumb.jpg" alt="media" /><br />
 
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.uni-giessen.de/videoblog-gcsc/?feed=rss2&amp;p=1528</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://flash.uni-giessen.de/vod/1b282210657d11e29d7ac348b46694ce.flv" length="350179122" type="video/x-flv" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Russian Culture 2012: A Battlefield</title>
		<link>http://www.uni-giessen.de/videoblog-gcsc/?p=1485</link>
		<comments>http://www.uni-giessen.de/videoblog-gcsc/?p=1485#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 12:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GGK/GCSC Keynote Lecture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uni-giessen.de/videoblog-gcsc/?p=1485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today Russia lives through a very unique and difficult moment, when  almost the entire society actively transforms and turns into opposition  to the autocratic state power. This situation seems to completely  transfigure Russian cultural and intellectual milieu, not only  politically, but also scientifically: methodological preferences and  paradigms in human sciences, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today Russia lives through a very unique and difficult moment, when  almost the entire society actively transforms and turns into opposition  to the autocratic state power. This situation seems to completely  transfigure Russian cultural and intellectual milieu, not only  politically, but also scientifically: methodological preferences and  paradigms in human sciences, cultural studies, philosophy are changing.  There is a huge demand and a mutual search for a dialog between  traditional humanitarian progressive liberal intelligentsia and the  younger generation of radical left, intellectuals and artists. This  dialog tends to oppose the dimension of critical knowledge and analysis  not only to a blind violence of the state, but also to its growing  religious ideology. This lecture aims to track possible turns and  dispositions and to expose all the difficulties of such a dialog.</p>
<p><strong><img class="alignright" src="http://www.uni-giessen.de/videoblog-gcsc/wp-content/timo_portrait.jpg" alt="" width="235" height="265" /><span> Oxana Timofeeva</span></strong></p>
<p><span> </span></p>
<p>Oxana Timofeeva was born in Siberia in 1978. She currently works in  Moscow as a Senior Research Fellow at the Institute of Philosophy of  Russian Academy of Sciences (Moscow), she is editor of the Theory  section of the &#8220;New Literary Observer&#8221; magazine, a member of the group  and critical internet platform &#8220;Chtodelat&#8221;, author of the books  &#8220;Introduction to the Erotic Philosophy of Georges Bataille&#8221; (Moscow: New  Literary Observer, 2009 &#8211; in Russian) and &#8220;History of Animals: An Essay  on Negativity, Immanence and Freedom&#8221; (Maastricht: Jan van Eyck  Academy, 2012 &#8211; in English). In 2010-2011 she was a researcher at the  Theory Department of the Jan van Eyck Academy in Maastricht, Holland, an  international post-academic institution. From May 2013 she is awarded a  Alexander von Humboldt Fellowship for experienced researchers (Humboldt  University of Berlin).</p>
<br /><img src="http://www.uni-giessen.de/videoblog-gcsc/wp-content/thumb_KN_Timofeeva.jpg" alt="media" /><br />
 
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.uni-giessen.de/videoblog-gcsc/?feed=rss2&amp;p=1485</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://flash.uni-giessen.de/vod/5b02414e483211e2a5c27c20b46694ce.flv" length="163814374" type="video/x-flv" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Creole Modernism? On Aimé Césaire and Wifredo Lam</title>
		<link>http://www.uni-giessen.de/videoblog-gcsc/?p=1364</link>
		<comments>http://www.uni-giessen.de/videoblog-gcsc/?p=1364#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 12:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GGK/GCSC Keynote Lecture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uni-giessen.de/videoblog-gcsc/?p=1364</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Against a model of singular and unilinear diffusionism, social theorists  have proposed that we approach global modernity by understanding  European modernity itself not as &#8217;self-producing, self-referential  system&#8217; but rather as &#8216;part of a world system&#8217; and thus in  dynamic, even dialectical tension with the peripheries it has produced  (Dussel). Yet [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Against a model of singular and unilinear diffusionism, social theorists  have proposed that we approach global modernity by understanding  European modernity itself not as &#8217;self-producing, self-referential  system&#8217; but rather as &#8216;<em>part</em> of a world system&#8217; and thus in  dynamic, even dialectical tension with the peripheries it has produced  (Dussel). Yet a model of diffusionism and unidirectional &#8220;influence&#8221;  persists in comparative studies of artistic and literary modernism in  the humanities, with &#8220;indigenization&#8221; as the governing concept. A  critique, or style, or disposition is born in Europe, travels to the  colonial periphery usually through an elite intellectual and there  eventually mixes with local forms and becomes indigenized. This lecture  will explore instead the idea of creolization and &#8220;transculturation&#8221; as  concepts adequate to a modernism in sync with the dynamic tension of  modernity as a world system and with the political edge of anticolonial  modernist experimentation. My primary focus will be on the chance  encounter of two pre-eminent anti-colonial artists in the Caribbean of  the early 1940s, Martinican poet Aimé Césaire and Cuban painter Wifredo  Lam.</p>
<p><img class="alignright" src="http://www.uni-giessen.de/videoblog-gcsc/wp-content/melas_portrait.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="264" /><strong>Natalie                Melas</strong>, Associate Professor of Comparative Literature, received her                Ph.D. in Comparative Literature (English, French, Ancient Greek)                from UC Berkeley. Her areas of interest include transcultural theory                (between postcolonialism and globalism), the politics of disciplinary                histories, cultural comparison, postcolonial neo-formalism, turn-of-the-century                English literature, Anglophone and especially Francophone Caribbean                literature and theory, modern reconfigurations of antiquity, Homer.                She has published essays on the fate of the humanities in the contemporary                university, on incommensurability, on Joseph Conrad, and on French                Caribbean Literature. Her book, <em>All the Difference in the World:                Postcoloniality and the Ends of Comparison</em>, is forthcoming with                Stanford University Press. Her current project, provisionally entitled                <em>The Poetics and Politics of Untimeliness</em>, addresses the formation                of alternative modernities in the broken link between modernism                and colonialism around two incommensurable figures, the modern Greek                poet Constantin Cavafy and Aime Cesaire.</p>
<br /><img src="http://www.uni-giessen.de/videoblog-gcsc/wp-content/KN_Melas_hell_thumb.jpg" alt="media" /><br />
 
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.uni-giessen.de/videoblog-gcsc/?feed=rss2&amp;p=1364</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://flash.uni-giessen.de/vod/55af6cdc5e3d11e2989bdd5eb46694ce.flv" length="206472859" type="video/x-flv" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is There a Transnational Queer Studies?</title>
		<link>http://www.uni-giessen.de/videoblog-gcsc/?p=1471</link>
		<comments>http://www.uni-giessen.de/videoblog-gcsc/?p=1471#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 14:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GGK/GCSC Keynote Lecture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uni-giessen.de/videoblog-gcsc/?p=1471</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since its birth in the early 1990s, queer theory and queer studies have circulated globally, by way of conferences, internationally influential essays and books, and other flows of scholarly information. However, in 2012 it is still worthwhile asking, “is there today a truly transnational queer studies?” This lecture will examine two ways of answering that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since its birth in the early 1990s, queer theory and queer studies have circulated globally, by way of conferences, internationally influential essays and books, and other flows of scholarly information. However, in 2012 it is still worthwhile asking, “is there today a truly transnational queer studies?” This lecture will examine two ways of answering that question: one is practical and skeptical; the other is theoretical and optimistic. In the first half of this talk, I will discuss the sometimes frustrating, if always exciting and rewarding work of co-editing a massive new anthology that attempts to capture “queer studies” in its current complexity and global circulation. The process of constructing The Routledge Queer Studies Reader (co-editors Hall and Jagose, published this year) revealed many of the impediments to realizing a transnational queer studies. The field remains constricted by linguistic, geographical, and base theoretical “norms,” even though, as a political and intellectual project, it claims to devote itself to challenging normative concepts and processes. On the other hand, there is cause for optimism. A highly dynamic “queer conversation” is flourishing globally that reveals the continuing, open-ended potentials of the field. In referencing Gadamerian concepts of dialogic challenge and epistemological change, I will conclude my talk with a set of reflections and queries that should lead to a productive conversation among audience members on the inherent limitations and still-to-be-realized potentials of queer studies in a transnational context.</p>
<p><img class="alignright" src="http://www.uni-giessen.de/videoblog-gcsc/wp-content/hall_4.jpg" alt="" width="206" height="274" /><strong>Donald E. Hall</strong> has published widely in the fields of British studies, queer theory, cultural studies, and professional studies. Prior to arriving at Lehigh in 2011, he served as Professor of English and Chair of the Department of English at West Virginia University (WVU). Before his tenure at WVU, he was Professor of English and Chair of the Department of English at California State University, Northridge, where he taught for thirteen years. He is a recipient of the University Distinguished Teaching Award at CSUN, was a visiting professor at the National University of Rwanda, was 2001 Lansdowne Distinguished Visiting Scholar at the University of Victoria (Canada), was Fulbright Distinguished Chair in Cultural Studies at Karl Franzens University in Graz, Austria, for 2004-05, and was Fulbright Senior Specialist at the University of Helsinki for 2006. He has served on numerous panels and committees for the Modern Language Association, including the Task Force on Evaluating Scholarship for Tenure and Promotion and the Convention Program Committee. From 2006-2007, he served as chair of the Department of Foreign Languages at WVU. In 2007, he became chair of the Department of English. In 2012, he was elected National President of the Association of Departments of English.</p>
<p>His current and forthcoming work examines issues such as professional responsibility and academic community-building, ethics and agency in sexuality studies, and the Victorian (and our continuing) interest in the deployment of instrumental agency over our social, vocational, and sexual selves. His book, The Academic Community: A Manual For Change, was published by Ohio State University Press in the fall of 2007. His tenth book, Reading Sexualities: Hermeneutic Theory and the Future of Sexuality Studies, was published in the spring of 2009. In 2012, he and Annamarie Jagose, of the University of Auckland, collaborated on a volume titled The Routledge Queer Studies Reader, which was published in July of that year.</p>
<br /><img src="http://www.uni-giessen.de/videoblog-gcsc/wp-content/hall_thumb.jpg" alt="media" /><br />

<div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.uni-giessen.de/videoblog-gcsc/?feed=rss2&amp;p=1471</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://flash.uni-giessen.de/vod/38f11f6242d811e29474457bb46694ce.flv" length="252856666" type="video/x-flv" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Performativität und Emotionalität</title>
		<link>http://www.uni-giessen.de/videoblog-gcsc/?p=1276</link>
		<comments>http://www.uni-giessen.de/videoblog-gcsc/?p=1276#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 13:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GGK/GCSC Keynote Lecture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uni-giessen.de/videoblog-gcsc/?p=1276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Die Kategorien der neueren Emotionsforschung bedürfen weiterhin der  Klärung und Differenzierung. Dies gilt bereits für den Begriff ‚Emotion‘  selbst, der zur Zeit häufig anderen affinen Begriffen wie Gefühl,  Empfindung, Begehren, Stimmung, Affekt, Leidenschaft vorgezogen wird,  aber auch für den Begriff der Performativität. Von diesem Problem  ausgehend wird der Vortrag zeigen, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Die Kategorien der neueren Emotionsforschung bedürfen weiterhin der  Klärung und Differenzierung. Dies gilt bereits für den Begriff ‚Emotion‘  selbst, der zur Zeit häufig anderen affinen Begriffen wie Gefühl,  Empfindung, Begehren, Stimmung, Affekt, Leidenschaft vorgezogen wird,  aber auch für den Begriff der Performativität. Von diesem Problem  ausgehend wird der Vortrag zeigen, wie die Kategorie der Performativität  für die literaturwissenschaftlich orientierte historische  Emotionsforschung produktiv gemacht werden kann. Zugleich wird die Frage  erörtert, welchen Erkenntniswert andere wichtige Kategorien haben, zum  Beispiel die der Alterität, der Historischen Semantik und der  Räumlichkeit.</p>
<p><img class="alignright" src="http://www.uni-giessen.de/videoblog-gcsc/wp-content/kasten1.jpg" alt="" width="192" height="275" /></p>
<p><strong>Ingrid Kasten</strong>, Study of Philosophy, Romance and Germanic Studies. 1973: PhD., 1983: Habilitation for German Philology, with particular consideration of the Romance Literatures of the Middle Ages. 1983: Professor at the University of Hamburg. 1986/87: substitute Professor at the Universities of Heidelberg and Göttingen. 1987: Professor and Chair of Medieval German Literature and Language at the Free University Berlin. 1991-1997: Member of the Board of Directors of the Deutscher Germanistenverband (from 1994-1997 as Vice-President). 1995-1997: Dean of the Department of Germanic Studies at the Free University Berlin. Member of the Berlin Zentrum für Historische Anthropologie (since 1996). Member of the Graduate School Körper-Inszenierungen (since 1997). Leader of the research project Emotionalität in der Literatur des Mittelalters within the framework of the Special Research Area Kulturen des Performativen at the Free University Berlin (since 1999). 2000 Election as a DFG Assessor. 2003: Distinguished Visiting Professorship at the Washington University in St. Louis, MO<br />
Main focus of research: Romance-Germanic literary relations in the Middle Ages, medieval lyric poetry, literary theory and literary history of feelings. In addition publications on female mysticism, the courtly romance, the verse novella, hagiographical texts, on the Geistliches Spiel and on the history of literary science.</p>
<p>Projekt <a href="http://www.sfb-performativ.de/seiten/a2_vorhaben.html" target="blank">Emotionalität in der Literatur des Mittelalters</a>, Sonderforschungsbereich &#8220;Kulturen des Performativen&#8221;, FU Berlin.</p>
<br /><img src="http://www.uni-giessen.de/videoblog-gcsc/wp-content/KN_Kasten_thumb.jpg" alt="media" /><br />
 
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.uni-giessen.de/videoblog-gcsc/?feed=rss2&amp;p=1276</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://flash.uni-giessen.de/vod/31c6dba2e86d11e1bb49ebf98ea92344.flv" length="226014120" type="video/x-flv" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Welcome &amp; Graduate Ceremony 2012</title>
		<link>http://www.uni-giessen.de/videoblog-gcsc/?p=1458</link>
		<comments>http://www.uni-giessen.de/videoblog-gcsc/?p=1458#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 17:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GCSC-Gründungsfeier]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uni-giessen.de/videoblog-gcsc/?p=1458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hier einige Eindrücke der diesjährigen GCSC-Welcome &#38; Graduate Ceremony 2012!
00:38 Dr. Joybrato Mukherjee
03:17 Dr.-Herbert-Stolzenberg-Awards
16:57 Herr Dr. Nünning will Musik
17:12 Kammermusik
19:22 Dr. Martin Lüthe, GCSC-Alumnus
25:48 Verabschiedung Alumni 2012
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hier einige Eindrücke der diesjährigen GCSC-Welcome &amp; Graduate Ceremony 2012!</p>
<br /><img src="http://www.uni-giessen.de/videoblog-gcsc/wp-content/WeGraCe.jpg" alt="media" /><br />

<p>00:38 Dr. Joybrato Mukherjee</p>
<p>03:17 Dr.-Herbert-Stolzenberg-Awards</p>
<p>16:57 Herr Dr. Nünning will Musik</p>
<p>17:12 Kammermusik</p>
<p>19:22 Dr. Martin Lüthe, GCSC-Alumnus</p>
<p>25:48 Verabschiedung Alumni 2012</p>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.uni-giessen.de/videoblog-gcsc/?feed=rss2&amp;p=1458</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://flash.uni-giessen.de/vod/730818061d2e11e2a581b31db46694ce.flv" length="200102235" type="video/x-flv" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Occasions of Narration in Ian McEwan´s Enduring Love: Or, Love, Logic, Madness, Contagion, and Narrative Structure</title>
		<link>http://www.uni-giessen.de/videoblog-gcsc/?p=1436</link>
		<comments>http://www.uni-giessen.de/videoblog-gcsc/?p=1436#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 07:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GGK/GCSC Keynote Lecture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uni-giessen.de/videoblog-gcsc/?p=1436</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This lecture has a theoretical and an interpretive component. The main  theoretical component develops the explanatory value of the concept  of &#8220;occasion&#8221; in the rhetorical definition of narrative: somebody  telling somebody else on some occasion and for some purposes that  something happened. In particular, I will consider the ways in which [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This lecture has a theoretical and an interpretive component. The main  theoretical component develops the explanatory value of the concept  of &#8220;occasion&#8221; in the rhetorical definition of narrative: somebody  telling somebody else on some occasion and for some purposes that  something happened. In particular, I will consider the ways in which the  occasion of narration in fiction functions to help communicate  authorial purpose. The interpretive component follows from this  theoretical component and in turn leads to another set of theoretical  claims. I consider the three occasions of telling by three different  tellers in McEwan&#8217;s novel: that of Joe Rose&#8217;s character narration that  constitutes the main narrative; that of the scientific essay on  erotomania that constitutes the first Appendix; and that of Jed Parry&#8217;s  unsent  letter to Joe, written from a mental institution considerably after the  events in the main narrative.  I argue that the latter two occasions  shed considerable light on the occasion of  Joe&#8217;s narration and that  such light in turn illuminates Joe&#8217;s purpose and its differences  from McEwan&#8217;s. This analysis of occasion and its consequences leads to  some reflections on the relationships between reliable and unreliable  narration.</p>
<p><img class="alignright" src="http://www.uni-giessen.de/videoblog-gcsc/wp-content/phelan_portrait_def.jpg" alt="" width="208" height="287" /></p>
<p>James Phelan is Humanities Distinguished Professor in the <a href="http://english.osu.edu/">Department   of English</a> at <a href="http://www.osu.edu/">Ohio State University</a>. Born   in Flushing, NY in 1951, he received his BA from Boston College (1972)   and his MA and Ph.D. from the University of Chicago (1977). He began as   an Assistant Professor at Ohio State in 1977, was promoted to Associate   Professor in 1983,  to Professor in 1989, and to Humanities Distinguished Professor in 2004. He served as Department Chair   from 1994-2002.<br />
Rather than working in only one historical   period, Phelan gravitates toward theoretical issues or problems, most often   connected with the genre of narrative, and pursues them in texts from different   periods. His recent work, however, has focused primarily on twentieth-century   British and American narrative, and he now claims the twentieth-century   as a specialty. He has written about style in <em>Worlds from Words</em>, about   character and narrative progression in <em>Reading People, Reading Plots</em>, about   technique, ethics, and audiences in <em><a href="http://www.ohiostatepress.org/Books/Book%20Pages/Phelan%20Narrative.htm">Narrative as Rhetoric</a></em>, about character   narration in<a href="http://www.cornellpress.cornell.edu/cup_catalog.taf?_function=detail&amp;Title_ID=4197&amp;_UserReference=7E97D3CEE3FE199E41A350E3"> <em>Living to Tell about It</em></a>, and about reader judgments  in <em><a href="http://www.ohiostatepress.org/Books/Book%20Pages/Phelan%20Experiencing.html">Experiencing Fiction</a></em>. He has also published the autobiographical   journal <em>Beyond the Tenure Track</em> and has edited, with Peter J. Rabinowitz,   <em><a href="http://www.ohiostatepress.org/books/book%20pages/Phelan%20Understanding.htm">Understanding Narrative</a></em>, and the <em><a href="http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/book.asp?ref=9781405114769&amp;site=1">Blackwell Companion to Narrative Theory</a></em>.   With Gerald Graff, he has edited <em>Adventures of Huckleberry Finn: A Case   Study in Critical Controversy</em>, which was awarded the 1997 Nancy Dasher   Award by the College English Association of Ohio as the best book on pedagogy   from an Ohio faculty member for 1994-96, and <em>The Tempest: A Case   Study in Critical Controversy</em>.<br />
Since 1992, Phelan has been the editor of   <em>Narrative</em>, the journal of the Society for the Study of  Narrative Literature   and winner of the 1993 CELJ Award for Best New Journal. Since 1993, he   has been co-editor, with Peter J. Rabinowitz, of the Ohio State  University   Press series on the Theory and Interpretation of Narrative.  He is   currently working on several manuscript projects and preparing for his  2008 NEH Summer Seminar for College and University Teachers on &#8220;<a href="http://people.cohums.ohio-state.edu/Phelan1/neh/index.html">Narrative Theory: Rhetoric and Ethics in Fiction and Nonfiction</a>.&#8221;</p>
<br /><img src="http://www.uni-giessen.de/videoblog-gcsc/wp-content/Phelan_thumb.jpg" alt="media" /><br />
 
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.uni-giessen.de/videoblog-gcsc/?feed=rss2&amp;p=1436</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://flash.uni-giessen.de/vod/b1299a5c1ce211e2ab27f412b46694ce.flv" length="350814701" type="video/x-flv" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Media Shock</title>
		<link>http://www.uni-giessen.de/videoblog-gcsc/?p=1415</link>
		<comments>http://www.uni-giessen.de/videoblog-gcsc/?p=1415#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 09:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GGK/GCSC Keynote Lecture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uni-giessen.de/videoblog-gcsc/?p=1415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Media today thrive on crisis, shock, and disaster.  At the first sign of  meteorological turmoil, social unrest, financial turbulence, or natural  cataclysm, print, televisual, and networked news media shift into  crisis mode, generating on-the-ground reports, live updates, multiple  commentaries and breaking news.  CNN pioneered the 24-7 crisis mode in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Media today thrive on crisis, shock, and disaster.  At the first sign of  meteorological turmoil, social unrest, financial turbulence, or natural  cataclysm, print, televisual, and networked news media shift into  crisis mode, generating on-the-ground reports, live updates, multiple  commentaries and breaking news.  CNN pioneered the 24-7 crisis mode in  global cable news as far back as the 1980s, but the media’s thirst for  crisis, its obsession with remediating disaster and premediating shock,  has intensified in the 21st century, jump-started by the events of 9/11  but escalating in the subsequent decade. More than a decade after 9/11,  much of the networked world remains in an acute state of “mediashock.”  In many respects this mediashock follows from the attacks on the World  Trade Center and the Pentagon—and more crucially from the overwhelming  media aftershocks that rumbled (and continue to rumble) through the  global economic and securitization apparatuses and across print,  televisual, and networked media.  But mediashock preexisted 9/11 and has  been intensified, transformed, and reinitiated many times in the 21st  century.</p>
<p style="text-indent:3.0em">This talk offers the concept of “mediashock,” as a way to try to make  sense of the mood or atmosphere of shock or crisis which media in the  21st century work simultaneously to create and to contain. “Mediashock”  can be understood as a form of what Nigel Thrift has characterized as  “non-representational theory,” and as such participates in the critique  of representationalism that has intensified in cultural, political, and  media theory over the past couple of decades.  Throughout the talk I  emphasize the affectivity of our media themselves and how this is  related to the affectivity of these natural/technical disasters or  crises, these geotechnical media events which are produced neither by  nature or society or technology but which emerge as complex assemblages,  new kinds of events or objects or actants in the world that are related  to but not finally reducible to the explosion of new information and  media technologies in the past few decades. In this talk I will focus  mainly on an exemplary case of the connection between the mediation of  disasters or crises and the affectivity of disaster or shock that they  produce, modulate, amplify, and shape—the remediation and premediation  of the Japanese earthquake and tsunami in March 2011 and the still  ongoing disaster at the Fukushima Daichii nuclear plant.</p>
<p style="text-indent:3.0em">While “mediashock” names a specific condition of the 21st century, the  concept also has its historical antecedents.  Despite the  intensification of media saturation, the unprecedented distribution of  communication media and technical devices, and an everyday mediasphere  that is much more complex, multiple, and contradictory than in previous  centuries, the concept of “mediashock” itself has a genealogy that goes  back at least to the beginning of the 20th century.  One of the tasks of  this initial foray into the concept of mediashock is to sketch out some  pieces of this genealogy, to show how earlier theorists have  articulated the way in which new technologies of mediation have entailed  and brought about fundamental changes in what Walter Benjamin called  the “human sensorium” or what Marshall McLuhan denoted as “sense  ratios.”</p>
<p style="text-indent:3.0em">
<p style="text-indent:3.0em">
<p><img class="alignright" src="http://www.uni-giessen.de/videoblog-gcsc/wp-content/grusin_portrait1.jpg" alt="" width="189" height="259" /><strong>Richard Grusin</strong> was named Center director starting with the 2010-11 academic year and is a Professor of English at University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee (UWM).</p>
<p>Professor Grusin received his Ph.D. from the University of  California–Berkeley, and has held faculty appointments at the College of  William and Mary, Georgia Institute of Technology, and Wayne State  (where he chaired the Department of English from 2001 to 2008). He  brings an outstanding record of institutional service and  interdisciplinary scholarship to UWM, and is the author of four books:</p>
<p><em>Transcendentalist Hermeneutics: Institutional Authority and the Higher Criticism of the Bible</em> (Duke, 1991), which concerns the influence of European (primarily  German) theories of biblical interpretation on the New England  Transcendentalists</p>
<p><em>Remediation: Understanding New Media</em> (MIT, 1999), co-authored  with Jay David Bolter, which sketches out a genealogy of new media,  beginning with the contradictory visual logics underlying contemporary  digital media</p>
<p><em>Culture, Technology, and the Creation of America’s National Parks</em> (Cambridge, 2004), which focuses on the problematics of visual  representation involved in the founding of America’s national parks</p>
<p><em>Premediation: Affect and Mediality After 9/11</em> (Palgrave  Macmillan, 2010), which argues that in an era of heightened  securitization, socially networked US and global media work to  pre-mediate collective affects of anticipation and connectivity, while  also perpetuating low levels of apprehension or fear.</p>
<br /><img src="http://www.uni-giessen.de/videoblog-gcsc/wp-content/Grusin_thumb.jpg" alt="media" /><br />
 
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.uni-giessen.de/videoblog-gcsc/?feed=rss2&amp;p=1415</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://flash.uni-giessen.de/vod/e315e9fcf37611e191d234dc8ea92344.flv" length="320816789" type="video/x-flv" />
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
