Bachelor
Bachelor
| Introduction to Business Administration | Scale | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
|
Winter term 25-26 |
The scale for evaluating the lecture reaches from 1 = very good to 5 = inadequate | 1,9 |
|
Summer term 25 |
The scale for evaluating the lecture reaches from 1 = very good to 5 = inadequate | 1,9 |
| Innovation & Marketing | Scale | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
|
Summer term 26 |
The scale for evaluating the lecture reaches from 1 = very good to 5 = inadequate | 1,8 |
|
Summer term 25 |
The scale for evaluating the lecture reaches from 1 = very good to 5 = inadequate | 1,9 |
| Management II | Scale | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
|
Summer term 24 (digital, as research semester) Last semester in which Management II was offered |
The scale for evaluating the lecture reaches from 1 = very good to 5 = inadequate | 2,1 |
| Summer term 23 | The scale for evaluating the lecture reaches from 1 = very good to 5 = inadequate | 1,6 |
| Summer term 22 | The scale for evaluating the lecture reaches from 1 = very good to 5 = inadequate | 2,0 |
| Summer term 21 (digital) | The scale for evaluating the lecture reaches from 1 = very good to 5 = inadequate | 1,6 |
| Summer term 20 (digital) | The scale for evaluating the lecture reaches from 1 = very good to 5 = inadequate | 1,8 |
| Summer term 19 | The scale for evaluating the lecture reaches from 1 = very good to 5 = inadequate | 1,8 |
| Summer term 18 | The scale for evaluating the lecture reaches from 1 = very good to 5 = inadequate | 1,6 |
| Summer term 17 | The scale for evaluating the lecture reaches from 1 = very good to 5 = inadequate | 1,6 |
| Entrepreneurship | Scale | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| Winter term 25/26 | The scale for evaluating the lecture reaches from 1 = very good to 5 = inadequate | 1,5 |
| Winter term 24/25 | The scale for evaluating the lecture reaches from 1 = very good to 5 = inadequate | 1,7 |
| Winter term 23/24 | The scale for evaluating the lecture reaches from 1 = very good to 5 = inadequate | 1,9 |
| Winter term 22/23 | The scale for evaluating the lecture reaches from 1 = very good to 5 = inadequate | 1,9 |
| Winter term 21/22 (digital) | The scale for evaluating the lecture reaches from 1 = very good to 5 = inadequate | 1,4 |
| Winter term 20/21 (digital) | The scale for evaluating the lecture reaches from 1 = very good to 5 = inadequate | 1,5 |
| Winter term 19/20 | The scale for evaluating the lecture reaches from 1 = very good to 5 = inadequate | 1,6 |
| Winter term 18/19 | The scale for evaluating the lecture reaches from 1 = very good to 5 = inadequate | 1,9 |
| Winter term 17/18 | The scale for evaluating the lecture reaches from 1 = very good to 5 = inadequate | 1,9 |
| Winter term 16/17 | The scale for evaluating the lecture reaches from 1 = very good to 5 = inadequate | 2,1 |
| Winter term 15/16 | The scale for evaluating the lecture reaches from 1 = very good to 5 = inadequate | 1,8 |
| Technology and Innovation Management |
Scale | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| Summer term 25 (English) | The scale for evaluating the lecture reaches from 1 = very good to 5 = inadequate | 1,6 |
| Summer term 24 (English + Digital, as research semester) | The scale for evaluating the lecture reaches from 1 = very good to 5 = inadequate | 2,7 |
| Summer term 23 (English) | The scale for evaluating the lecture reaches from 1 = very good to 5 = inadequate | 1,8 |
| Summer term 22 ((English + Representation by Jun.-Prof. Dr. Tobias Krämer) | The scale for evaluating the lecture reaches from 1 = very good to 5 = inadequate | 2,0 |
| Summer term 21 (English + digital) | The scale for evaluating the lecture reaches from 1 = very good to 5 = inadequate | 1,5 |
| Summer term 20 (English + digital) | The scale for evaluating the lecture reaches from 1 = very good to 5 = inadequate | 1,8 |
| Summer term 19 (English) | The scale for evaluating the lecture reaches from 1 = very good to 5 = inadequate | 2,1 |
| Summer term 18 (English) | The scale for evaluating the lecture reaches from 1 = very good to 5 = inadequate | 2,0 |
| Summer term 17 | The scale for evaluating the lecture reaches from 1 = very good to 5 = inadequate | 1,7 |
| Summer term 16 | The scale for evaluating the lecture reaches from 1 = very good to 5 = inadequate | 1,9 |
| Proseminar | Scale | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| Winter term 25/26 | The scale for evaluating the lecture reaches from 1 = very good to 5 = inadequate | 2,7 |
| Summer term 25 | The scale for evaluating the lecture reaches from 1 = very good to 5 = inadequate | 1,9 |
| Summer term 24 (digital, as research semester) | The scale for evaluating the lecture reaches from 1 = very good to 5 = inadequate | 1,7 |
| Winter term 23/24 | The scale for evaluating the lecture reaches from 1 = very good to 5 = inadequate | 2,3 |
| Summer term 23 (digital) | The scale for evaluating the lecture reaches from 1 = very good to 5 = inadequate | 1,9 |
| Winter term 22/23 (digital) | Not enough participants | - |
| Winter term 21/22 (digital) | The scale for evaluating the lecture reaches from 1 = very good to 5 = inadequate | 2,2 |
| Summer term 21 (digital) | The scale for evaluating the lecture reaches from 1 = very good to 5 = inadequate | 1,2 |
| Winter term 20/21 (digital) | The scale for evaluating the lecture reaches from 1 = very good to 5 = inadequate | 2,0 |
| Winter term 19/20 | The scale for evaluating the lecture reaches from 1 = very good to 5 = inadequate | 1,8 |
| Summer term 19 | The scale for evaluating the lecture reaches from 1 = very good to 5 = inadequate | 1,7 |
| Winter term 18/19 | The scale for evaluating the lecture reaches from 1 = very good to 5 = inadequate | 1,4 |
| Summer term 18 | The scale for evaluating the lecture reaches from 1 = very good to 5 = inadequate | 1,6 |
| Winter term 17/18 | The scale for evaluating the lecture reaches from 1 = very good to 5 = inadequate | 1,8 |
| Summer term 17 | The scale for evaluating the lecture reaches from 1 = very good to 5 = inadequate | 1,9 |
| Winter term 16/17 | The scale for evaluating the lecture reaches from 1 = very good to 5 = inadequate | 1,9 |
| Summer term 16 | The scale for evaluating the lecture reaches from 1 = very good to 5 = inadequate | 2,0 |